From my Twitter account:- "Wikipedia is a perfect place to start your research, but should never be the one you finish your search with" - PubMed is a better start. Wikipedia is not a primary source for med students/residents. It can be used for illustrative purposes for med blogs if you can verify info. Medical blogs are not a source of "actionable" medical information, same with Wikipedia. You want to be treated by an expert - not a "crowd."
- Twitter Wants To Be “The Pulse Of The Planet” http://bit.ly/s1ZDz
- "Going Home Again" - a poignant reflection from Life as a Healthcare CIO http://bit.ly/goxfZ
- "Ten ways to change your life in 59 seconds" - The Telegraph reviews a book by popular psychologist Richard Wiseman http://bit.ly/YwwYg
- Google Reader is an RSS reader - with so many social media tools that it can replace Twitter/FriendFeed if it were more popular...
- Spam comment on my blog (now deleted): "I am 61 using Online Viagra. I never had any problems, it only improved my erections" - by "Julia" ?!
- Photo: President Obama gets a tour of Russian President's office at his dacha outside Moscow http://bit.ly/2Gb7LL - Huge monitors...
Image source: OpenClipArt.org, public domain.
Thank you for this comment on wikipedia.
ReplyDeleteI am aghast at the number of groups that will use them as main sources...just not right!
I'd much rather know exactly who the expert is, so I know the spin, etc.